本文件基于测量和模拟，涉及建筑物中人体暴露于全身振动和冲击，以及居住者的舒适度和烦恼。它规定了用于测量和评估的方法，包括确定测量方向和测量位置。它定义了频率加权Wm，适用于1 Hz至80 Hz的频率范围，其中不需要定义乘员的姿势，参见附录A。 注1:如果定义了乘员的姿势，可以使用ISO 2631-1中给出的频率权重。 虽然通常情况下建筑物可用于实验研究，但本文件中包含的许多概念同样适用于设计过程中的建筑物或无法进入现有建筑物的情况。在这些情况下，必须通过某种方式依赖于建筑物响应的预测。 本文件没有提供关于结构损坏可能性的指导，这在ISO 4866中有讨论。此外，它不适用于对人类健康和安全影响的评估。 本文件中没有说明可接受的振动大小，但附件C中以暴露-响应曲线的形式提供了指导，用于估计振动来自各种来源（包括铁路、建筑活动和爆破）时的干扰。 注2暴露-响应曲线基于最新证据，该证据表明人类对建筑物振动的响应取决于振动的大小、频率、持续时间和时间特征【4】。此外，已知与振动特性不直接相关的其他因素对烦恼响应具有显著影响。这些在附件B中确定，包括考虑一些平行效应、主观印象和社会人口因素，这些因素在收集振动数据时需要考虑。 注3已提出几项国家标准，以定义评估建筑物振动暴露的方法以及判断暴露引起的烦恼的参考值。这些标准通常在用于量化暴露的指标和方法以及防止不良影响的指导值方面存在显著差异。一些标准定义了基于导致暴露的实验现场数据的限值-响应关系，如附件C中提出的响应关系。其他标准将其极限值基于考虑振动感知阈值和情境因素的估计。一些标准还考虑了可能对建筑物造成损坏风险的振动大小，特别是在涉及爆破时。

This document concerns human exposure to whole-body vibration and shock in buildings with respect to the comfort and annoyance of the occupants based on both measurements and simulations. It specifies a method for measurement and evaluation, comprising the determination of the measurement direction and measurement location. It defines the frequency weighting, Wm, which is applicable in the frequency range 1 Hz to 80 Hz where the posture of an occupant does not need to be defined, see Annex A.

NOTE 1        The frequency weightings given in ISO 2631-1 can be used if the posture of the occupant is defined.

Whilst it is often the case that a building will be available for experimental investigation, many of the concepts contained within this document would apply equally to a building in the design process or where it will not be possible to gain access to an existing building. In these cases, reliance will have to be placed on the prediction of the building response by some means.

This document does not provide guidance on the likelihood of structural damage, which is discussed in ISO 4866. Further, it is not applicable to the evaluation of effects on human health and safety.

Acceptable magnitudes of vibration are not stated in this document, but guidance is provided in Annex C in the form of exposure-response curves for the estimation of annoyance when vibration originates from various sources, including railway, construction activities and blasting.

NOTE 2        The exposure-response curves are based on the most recent evidence which suggests that human response to vibration in buildings is dependent on the magnitude, frequency, duration and temporal characteristics of the vibration[4]. In addition, it is known that other factors not directly related to the vibration characteristics have a significant influence on the annoyance response. These are identified in Annex B and include consideration of some parallel effects, subjective impressions and socio-demographic factors which need to be accounted for when collecting vibration data.

NOTE 3        Several national standards have been proposed to define methods for assessing exposure to vibration in buildings as well as reference values for judging the annoyance resulting from exposure. These standards generally present significant differences in terms of metrics and methods used to quantify exposure as well as on the guideline values to prevent adverse effects. Some standards define limit values that are based on experimental field data leading to exposure-response relationships such as those proposed in Annex C. Other standards base their limit values on estimations that take into account vibration perception thresholds and situational factors. Some standards also consider the magnitude of vibration that can present a risk of damage to the buildings, particularly when blasting is involved.